On the Quality of Climate 'Skepticism'.
....How about — ‘promoting a standard of scientific honest [sic] that the IPCC and the hockey team have made every effort to avoid.’
Judith – I don’t think you’ve read what he’s written. And I am not sure he read what you wrote either.
Mr Seitter is still entrenched in his CAGW bubble and can’t possibly understand much about the Uncertainty Monster.
I think I got it now….it was those ice-age humans that started making the earth warmer…must have been all that nasty CO2 stuff from the fires they started lighting and it’s only been getting worse and worse ever since….it’s quite obvious, isn’t it, that man has been ruining the earth.
When I first read the IPCC assessment report, I was surprised by the corruption of normal standards of statistical certainty/uncertainty and confidence limits. Since when was 90% good enough??
“There are scores of posters at WUWT who are convinced that AGW doesn’t exist.”
That’s because there’s no direct evidence to present that any GW is caused by A.